|
|
10-25-2020, 08:21 AM | #1 |
Brigadier General
1947
Rep 3,250
Posts
Drives: 2018 BMW 440i GC
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern MA
|
Autonomous vehicle technology
Maybe we can make this a discussion of the technology and progress towards self-driving and assisted-driving tech? Here is a link to a recent video of a driver using Tesla's "full self-driving" (FSD) beta. What do you think about it and the future of this tech/software?
|
10-25-2020, 11:57 AM | #2 |
Brigadier General
6805
Rep 3,166
Posts |
Been very, very bearish about this since day 1. I have always maintained that for it to work, drivers need to be banned so the cars can all communicate. This idea that Level 4 is acceptable or Level 5 with a mix of Ai and real drivers on the road will work is hogwash. It's astoundingly difficult and some of the world's largest companies have walked away from it in recent years basically saying "this is just too fucking hard".
5 years ago I said 25 years before this works, and i stand by it. |
Appreciate
5
|
10-25-2020, 12:05 PM | #3 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
5834
Rep 1,976
Posts |
Quote:
I think autopilot is amazing. It is the best adaptive cruise/lane keep assist on the market and I use it pretty much every time we go on a long drive. That being said I don't find it as impressive when you consider my $1k comma.ai device which runs off a pretty shitty smart phone can do almost everything autopilot does and IMO does many things better. However unless I can take a nap in the back of the car I do not consider it FSD and I don't see that happening anytime soon regardless of what Elon may claim. |
|
Appreciate
2
5.M0NSTER3362.00 antzcrashing1947.00 |
10-25-2020, 01:07 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant Colonel
3362
Rep 1,823
Posts |
We should be looking at other players such as Waymo or Cruise Automation (who work with GM). They already test with no human drivers behind the wheel. They also made a conscious decision to skip Level 3 and go directly to Level 4 because human driver's get dependent on the machine, and don't intervene when needed.
I think those players are a lot closer to full Autonomous driving than Tesla. Why? Because Elon decided that Lidar is not needed. Only cameras. Since that's how humans do it, just visual. And that's great, if you have completely mapped and re-created the part of the human mind responsible for spatial reasoning, orientation, reflexes and decision making base on positioning and relative approach velocities. But we are nowhere close. Machines will need more inputs to recreate human decisions, or to even perceive in a similar way to us. So I think use of Lidar is required today to be autonomous. Waymo, Cruise and Ford have all decided to use Lidar, so they have a shot. In my opinion using camera only is a no-go for full automation in the next 25 years. If all vehicles are equipped with short range transponders which can indicate relative positions to each other, as well as velocities and angles of approach (or at least enough data so that those can be calculated in near rear time), we can get away from Lidar. But we're nowhere near that today, or in the next decade. The next step for existing players with array of sensing in place is to teach AI to start taking calculated risks, like human drivers do every day. If a machine is programmed to only make a left turn when it's clear, those cars will never move during rush hour. I think this is the next challenge for AI divers
__________________
2017 BMW M2 German Spec
6MT, Driver's Package --> SOLD 2018 Camaro SS 1LE. Because race car! "Redline a day keeps the mechanics away" |
Appreciate
4
|
10-25-2020, 02:11 PM | #5 |
Banned
6651
Rep 4,143
Posts
Drives: '18 M2 6MT
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Missouri
|
I love it, and can't wait for it to be an everyday reality.
|
Appreciate
1
antzcrashing1947.00 |
10-25-2020, 02:26 PM | #6 | |
General
18724
Rep 19,450
Posts |
Quote:
While the autonomous technology is extremely difficult to develop and implement, the legal and governmental challenges are the most difficult issues to overcome, and they are not even yet fully known. These issues will take decades to resolve. Mixing humans with self-driving machines will further increase the time and cost of adoption. Some engineering exercises are not worth the pursuit. How about we just make people more responsible for operating their automobiles. Real simple.
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
|
|
Appreciate
3
|
10-25-2020, 03:33 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant Colonel
5834
Rep 1,976
Posts |
This assumes self driving tech is being developed because people are shit drivers. I'm not sure that is the main reason for developing the tech. Also if you have the ability to "make people more responsible" then why are you even on this forum? I mean... I can't imagine I would have much time to post here if I was on my mega yacht full of hookers and blow.
|
Appreciate
1
5.M0NSTER3362.00 |
10-25-2020, 04:10 PM | #8 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
3362
Rep 1,823
Posts |
Quote:
Making people more responsible is not easy. They won't stop drinking and driving, they won't stop checking the phone, they won't stop eating or doing the makeup. Most crashes world wide are single vehicle accidents. Going off the road and hitting something. This is where Autonomous tech will help most.
__________________
2017 BMW M2 German Spec
6MT, Driver's Package --> SOLD 2018 Camaro SS 1LE. Because race car! "Redline a day keeps the mechanics away" |
|
Appreciate
1
antzcrashing1947.00 |
10-25-2020, 04:27 PM | #9 |
Brigadier General
6805
Rep 3,166
Posts |
That's fine, but it DOES NOT WORK and it is not even close to working. We either mandate drivers off the road or we wait 20 years because right now it is a massive fail.
|
Appreciate
1
antzcrashing1947.00 |
10-25-2020, 09:07 PM | #10 | |
General
18724
Rep 19,450
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
2
antzcrashing1947.00 freakystyly3472.50 |
10-25-2020, 10:10 PM | #11 |
Lieutenant Colonel
5834
Rep 1,976
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2020, 07:25 AM | #12 |
Brigadier General
6805
Rep 3,166
Posts |
It doesn't work TBH. AUstralia is SAVAGE with speeding in particular as well as drink driving. Every cop has a breathaliser in the car and can test you at any time for no reason and we catch a LOT of people, but people still do it. The fines are enormous too, and for speeding the fines are insanely high with virtually zero tolerance and there are speed cameras EVERYWHERE ... yet people speed.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2020, 10:40 AM | #13 | |
Brigadier General
3006
Rep 3,605
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2018 Camaro SS 1LE, 2023 Colorado ZR2. Former: BMW 428i Gran Coupe.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2020, 10:55 AM | #14 |
Brigadier General
6805
Rep 3,166
Posts |
A typical bald eagle, gun carrying, evil oppressive government type of American would have a fit if they ever stepped foot in Australia re. the speed cameras, heavy police presence and no questions asked breathalyzer tests.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2020, 11:02 AM | #15 | |
めらみぽっぷ fan
375
Rep 345
Posts |
Quote:
Automatic safety features are a good thing. I have zero interest in full self-driving, though. The person behind the wheel of a death machine should never be given any reason to think that their full attention is not required at all times. "Bad drivers" should not be in the driver's seat, whether they are doing any driving or not. Computers can outperform humans in many areas, but they will never be able to read or react to certain situations like we can. I think driverless taxis and similar could be seen in the not too distant future, but limited to specific routes and low speeds.
__________________
2020 330i xDrive in mineral white.
Username and profile picture in admiration of the goddess of treble, めらみぽっぷ (Meramipop). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQYWhQXOeQg https://open.spotify.com/playlist/1w...1L3y6cmPEyGSoI Last edited by Merami fan; 10-26-2020 at 11:10 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2020, 11:11 AM | #16 | ||
Brigadier General
1947
Rep 3,250
Posts
Drives: 2018 BMW 440i GC
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern MA
|
Quote:
However, I stop short of saying that excessive fines prevent all bad behavior. Some bad apples are going to push the envelope no matter what. The tesla FSD beta has clearly been given to a very select group of users - likely even with NDAs and no-sue waivers. The leap from this group to a general Tesla-owner group will be a big leap. If anyone can pull this off it is Tesla, but it wont be easy it wont be quiet. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2020, 11:30 AM | #17 | |
General
18724
Rep 19,450
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2020, 11:35 AM | #19 |
Major
1389
Rep 1,031
Posts
Drives: Like a bat out of hell.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: here and there
|
FSD could work on a fixed express lane where every driver relinquish all control and let their vehicles follow a central command. People are unpredictable. I don't think you can program an AI to respond to all the scenarios of how all human behave. Google autonomous vehicles have been hit and it can only go 25MPH. We're still a long way and several regulations to go. However, driving is 75% of the fun of getting there. This is why most of us chose a BMW. What would the new slogan be, the Ultimate Self Driving Machine?
|
Appreciate
1
antzcrashing1947.00 |
10-26-2020, 11:53 AM | #20 |
BXR
577
Rep 636
Posts |
Just like the electrification of cars, it's the future.
The better cars get at seeing each other and the more cars that have better vision, the more quickly this will be normalized. Tesla is obviously the vanguard here, but the other big names will eventually follow. We're probably 10-15 years out from significantly widespread implementation, but it's coming.
__________________
2012 135i M Sport Alpine White
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2020, 12:18 PM | #21 | |
General
18724
Rep 19,450
Posts |
Quote:
Cars seeing other cars is a far too simplistic view of the implementation. Sensors and software are fault prone. The objective is to not place two vehicles at the same place at the same time. The best way to accomplish that is to have all vehicles paths preprogrammed to avoid vehicle interaction and have contingency planning in case of errors. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2020, 12:23 PM | #22 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
3362
Rep 1,823
Posts |
Quote:
Tesla is nowhere near this level of sensory based awareness. Quote:
That's because Waymo have the right sensorics combination to map out the objects around them. Something Tesla can not achieve in the next 25 years with only using cameras. Or more specifically without the use of lidar.
__________________
2017 BMW M2 German Spec
6MT, Driver's Package --> SOLD 2018 Camaro SS 1LE. Because race car! "Redline a day keeps the mechanics away" Last edited by 5.M0NSTER; 10-26-2020 at 12:33 PM.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|