|
|
12-15-2010, 12:37 AM | #45 |
sportscars only
3436
Rep 3,258
Posts |
The weight savings would be huge w/o a doubt. However, is there a precedent for any carmaker going to such lengths?
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 07:14 AM | #46 | ||
Lieutenant
18
Rep 409
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
- J
__________________
In Memory of LeRoi Moore 1961-2008.
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 07:37 AM | #47 | |
Resistance is futile...
57
Rep 640
Posts |
Quote:
I dont see how a Z4M would hurt the 1M sales tho... The 1 series M is the lower entry M car and has a totally different target audience. The future M6 sales? Maybe. The trend in BMW now though is Twin Turbo (N54 N63) and thats also the route (according to rumours) their going with the F series M3. Anyway, any near future chance of an M version with the Z is gonna be with the facelift in a year or so or as they stated or they might not go with an M version at all for this generation.
__________________
An ounce of performance is worth pounds of promises.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 10:28 AM | #48 | |
Happy Camper
628
Rep 7,869
Posts
Drives: C63 AMG & 280 SL on Weekends :
Join Date: May 2010
Location: GTA, Ontario - Canada
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1969 Restored Merce ... [7.50]
2011 M3 Coupe TRADED [7.34] 1987 BMW 535is [1.00] Cars from the Past [6.50] The ///M3 Engine S65 [9.59] |
Quote:
I posted some time ago the idea about the hardtop. I was hoping some Designer type from BMW would read it and pick up on the idea (then they properly are thinking about it). Anyway I think I said in that post it would be nice if they do make a MZ4 and make it with a soft top and the hardtop as an extra option. With the hardtop they could design a storage device that mounts to the garage ceiling to store the hardtop when not in use (similar to a bike storage for the ceiling). As you said it would save a few pounds and make a Z4M so much more attractive. It could be very slick to store the hardtop out of the way tight under the ceiling by string and pulley mechanism. I have those gadgets for one of my bikes and my golf bag and they do work like a charm. I would gladly remove my bike lift mechanism and replace the lift with a MZ4 hardtop lift mechanism .... so BMW Designers if one of you reads this get busy with this idea (make it a sales incentive if we get the hardtop roof option trow the lift mechanism in free ). Ah lets wait and see what the future brings
__________________
Cheers, Rolf-Dieter
Life will take us to some interesting places, fortunately The ///M3 will too with a many of us know this very well, now my C6.3 AMG with 487 HP does it too ---> Click here for some good stuff I found |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 10:32 AM | #49 | |
Captain
612
Rep 969
Posts |
Quote:
So that's not a great apples to apples comparison with a hypothetical Z4 case. There may be other analogies that are better. The weight savings due to top/actuation/mechanism removal in the Z4 will be a lot more significant than the S2000 case. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 12:48 PM | #50 | |
Lieutenant
18
Rep 409
Posts |
Quote:
- J
__________________
In Memory of LeRoi Moore 1961-2008.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 01:45 PM | #51 |
Captain
28
Rep 805
Posts
Drives: 2011 Z4 35is Melbourne Red
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portland, OR
|
Let's not forget weight balance in our effort to make the car lighter. If you remove 100 lbs from the rear something up front needs to change in order to balance the car.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 02:51 PM | #52 | |
Happy Camper
628
Rep 7,869
Posts
Drives: C63 AMG & 280 SL on Weekends :
Join Date: May 2010
Location: GTA, Ontario - Canada
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1969 Restored Merce ... [7.50]
2011 M3 Coupe TRADED [7.34] 1987 BMW 535is [1.00] Cars from the Past [6.50] The ///M3 Engine S65 [9.59] |
Quote:
We drive with the roof up and the roof down, right. The retractable hardtop that is. The balance of the car is perhaps better with the roof up (is my estimate). The balance must be somewhat displaced with the roof tugged away in the trunk. So it makes much more sense to make a MZ4 (should they ever make one) with a removable hardtop. Speaking from a Designer point of view it would be much easier to design the car(s) weight distribution with the weight of a hardtop in only one location and a lightweight ragtop in the trunk. This way I think balancing weights during the designing front and back is a much easier task. What do you think? PS. A very knowledgeable tire shop service manager told me (in the US) premature wear on your tire on the inside is normal with the extra weight of the roof in the trunk. Later my BMW service manager told me add 4 PSI to your rear wheels when you drive long distances with the top in the trunk. both seam to know are they telling us everything? I wonder.
__________________
Cheers, Rolf-Dieter
Life will take us to some interesting places, fortunately The ///M3 will too with a many of us know this very well, now my C6.3 AMG with 487 HP does it too ---> Click here for some good stuff I found Last edited by Mr. ///M3 RD; 12-15-2010 at 02:59 PM.. Reason: added PS |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 03:47 PM | #53 |
sportscars only
3436
Rep 3,258
Posts |
Unfortunately, it just doesn't make sense for BMW to go w/ a pure coupe as a future model because it totally defeats the concept of going w/ a hardtop. Like all you guys are saying, besides the difficulty of removing the roof and the mechanism, there are balancing issues. They would literally almost be developing another car. If it was that simple to remove the weight and plunk a regular roof on the car, another manufacturer would have done it a long time ago. All they did w/ the e85 and the Boxster was just plunk a roof on top and make the coupe even heavier than the convertible, which sucks.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-18-2010, 06:07 AM | #54 | |
Lieutenant
18
Rep 409
Posts |
Quote:
They will have to find a way to add some lightness. It will be interesting to see if the Z4M develops and if so how it is positioned in price as well as performance. - J
__________________
In Memory of LeRoi Moore 1961-2008.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2010, 05:23 PM | #55 |
Brigadier General
443
Rep 3,888
Posts |
There will be a Z4 M, that is quite sure. But will it be as I want it, very cheaply done, just as the 1SMC, using parts from the BIN?
M3 GTS 4.4l V8 S65B44 M3 GTS KW Clubsport Suspensions M3 GTS Brembo Brakes M3 GT4 Akrapovic Exhaust M3 GT4 4.10 LSD Z4 GT3 CF Hardtop |
Appreciate
0
|
12-29-2010, 06:47 PM | #56 |
Midlife Crises Racing Silent but Deadly Class
1827
Rep 5,337
Posts
Drives: 2006 MZ4C, 2021 Tesla Model 3
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Welcome to Jamaica have a nice day
|
There will not be a Z4 M, and here's why.
The first generation Z3 M sold very poorly. A total of 2,870 Z3 M Coupes sold in North America. The following Z4 M sold even worse. A total of 1,780 Z4 M Coupes sold in North America. Roadster sales basically doubles coupe sales. Reasonably speaking, roughly around 5,500 Z3 Ms and 3,500 Z4 Ms sold in North America. That is a PISS POOR number. By contrast, MORE Z8s sold in the same amount of time in North America than Z4 M Coupes. And the margins on the Z8s were far higher...And the Z8 was still a sales flop. Anyone here that thinks there will be another Z4 M in the E89 chassis is smoking crack. EVEN if the E89 Z4 M sold as well as the Z4 M roadster and coupe combined in North America BMW will NEVER make back the investment in $$$ needed to pass certain regulations here in the United States. And to move that 1,780 Z4 M Coupes BMW had to throw $10,000 worth of trunk cash on top of every single Z4 M sold after 2006. Trust me, anyone over at BMW NA and AG that brings up the possibility of another Z4 M will probably be fired on site.
__________________
Sitting on a beat-up office chair in front of a 5 year old computer in a basement floor, sipping on stale coffee watching a bunch of meaningless numbers scrolling aimlessly on a dimly lit 19” monitor.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2010, 04:04 AM | #57 | |
Ed
20
Rep 298
Posts |
You could be right, especially now the 35is is on the market. An M version would far to be expensive.
I don't think BMW will skip an M E89 because of the low volume of sold M E36 and E86/86. I guess they already knew that these numbers would be low because of the low volume non M versions, especially the E36/8 and E86. The Z435is is already a fast car and I can imagine that an even more powerful engine could replace the currently used N54 version. When it comes to handling and think the future low weight (M) Z2 will be the one to take that job. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2010, 07:26 PM | #58 |
Banned
148
Rep 2,042
Posts |
Well over here a Z4 35is sells for around $130k+ . I would pay around $150k to 160k+ for a M version ($$ & weight savings come from removing the expensive hardtop mechanism). That puts it into current M3 coupe territory, which it should be slightly faster against. Whack the V8 in there. Beautiful.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2010, 07:59 PM | #59 | |
Colonel
65
Rep 2,087
Posts |
Whatever - for all your dogmatic statements, you don't know anymore than anyone else. The only people that really know the math, the markets, what would sell and what wouldn't are the top dudes at BMW.
Quote:
__________________
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end".-- Unknown
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2010, 08:12 PM | #60 | |
Colonel
65
Rep 2,087
Posts |
Quote:
For street performance, I like the n54 better. The s65 V8 doesn't start to show it true colors until you rev it up past 3k - 4k RPM.
__________________
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end".-- Unknown
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2010, 08:56 PM | #61 |
Happy Camper
628
Rep 7,869
Posts
Drives: C63 AMG & 280 SL on Weekends :
Join Date: May 2010
Location: GTA, Ontario - Canada
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1969 Restored Merce ... [7.50]
2011 M3 Coupe TRADED [7.34] 1987 BMW 535is [1.00] Cars from the Past [6.50] The ///M3 Engine S65 [9.59] |
You mean you will put some crack in your pipe (be sure to e-mail me) when the Z4 M comes out .... I know a guy that knows a dude that can make your wish come true and let you have some crack
__________________
Cheers, Rolf-Dieter
Life will take us to some interesting places, fortunately The ///M3 will too with a many of us know this very well, now my C6.3 AMG with 487 HP does it too ---> Click here for some good stuff I found |
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2010, 09:07 PM | #62 |
your average JAMF
3415
Rep 4,157
Posts
Drives: '21 M2 Comp, '19 Golf R
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cochise County, AZ
|
The above statement isn't accurate. I bought my Z4MC in August of '07, and the trunk money had JUST been bumped up to $5k, which enabled me to get a deal done. $10k came much later. Nonetheless, doesn't change your basic point. I agree, makes NO sense to build a Z89 M.
__________________
'21 M2 Comp
'19 Golf R |
Appreciate
0
|
12-30-2010, 10:25 PM | #63 |
sportscars only
3436
Rep 3,258
Posts |
I don't know what the big deal is...it doesn't have to "make sense". For example, dealers often sell cars that don't make any profit just to maintain mkt share. If they do come out w/ the M, it'll be more because of the prestige and it being the halo car for the Z.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|