View Single Post
      09-03-2021, 04:43 PM   #27
RickFLM4
Brigadier General
RickFLM4's Avatar
United_States
10981
Rep
4,821
Posts

Drives: M4
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: PB County, FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoeTE87 View Post
Just give it time. Rough first half with a 19 year old kid starting his first ever college game. I believe it was the right call. He led with his shoulder and grazed with the side of his helmet. If he led with the crown then yes...def targeting.

Or we can go on and on about the consistent non holding calls from the Minnesota's o-line? I saw countless times their o-line grabbing the OSU d-lineman jerseys and pulling them to the ground..

If you want to talk a cheap call...what about that so called roughing the passer penalty in the first half when the Minnesota QB threw that pick? OSU player hit him in the chest making a football play with his hands up trying to hit the ball.

OSU offense is for real. Defense...that is another story..

The Oregon game will be huge...hope the D Coordinator can make some adjustments and get a few of the starters back that didn't play last night.
C’mon he led with his helmet and you could see clear helmet to helmet contact from at least one angle. Would be automatic targeting against some other teams.

The frustration many fans have isn’t necessarily with that non-call but with the fact their teams have been flagged for targeting for similar or less obvious hits. Targeting is not called on anything close to a consistent basis across CFB so enforcement should either be fixed to be more consistent or the penalty should be eliminated. It’s too much of a game changer penalty to not get right on a consistent basis.
__________________
Current: 2018 SO/SS F83 ZCP
Gone: 2015 SO/SO F82
Appreciate 0