|
Top 5? Stats and QB rating mean SFA. A QB who wins is far more important than one with pretty stats. Know why Brady, Brees, Manning, Roethlisberger, Wilson, and Flacco are better QB's than Romo? Because they've won Super Bowls and they've all had that moment where they had to put their teams on their shoulders and do it themselves. Palmer may not have won a Super Bowl, but the same's true of him.
Then you add the younger QB's who are showing the same potential right now (Carr, Mariota, Prescott) ...
All are a better choice behind center than Romo.
Doesn't make Romo a bad QB, but it does make him the second best QB in Dallas and the second best option for the Cowboys. That's all I said.
I don't care what Dallas club records he holds. He's not a better QB than Staubach or Aikman and that he was maybe better than Danny White doesn't mean much. Stats don't matter for shit except when they make a difference in the win/loss column in big games.
|