New 2009 2010 BMW Z4 - ZPOST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   New 2009 2010 BMW Z4 - ZPOST > BMW Z4 Forum (E89) > 2009-Current Z4 Forum (E89) General Discussion

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-16-2009, 05:26 PM   #1
PaulBailey@ltbmw
General
PaulBailey@ltbmw's Avatar
Italy
662
Rep
26,878
Posts

Drives: 2-325 330 2-335 2-Z4 2-135 X5d
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

iTrader: (34)

Garage List
Arrow BMW Z4 sDrive35i vs Porsche Boxster S

http://magazine.windingroad.com/issue/51/
Attached Images
       
Appreciate 0
      11-16-2009, 06:44 PM   #2
Memphis1
Lieutenant Colonel
Memphis1's Avatar
United_States
89
Rep
1,838
Posts

Drives: Z4 SDrive 35i
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CT

iTrader: (0)

not bad... neat set up for reading.
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2009, 12:03 AM   #3
flpnout
Major
flpnout's Avatar
United_States
81
Rep
1,264
Posts

Drives: 2010 Dinan S3 Z4-35i
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA

iTrader: (8)

Garage List
2010 E89 Z4  [7.83]
I like that online magazine! Thanks for sharing. Both cars are great! A good positive review on both.
__________________
2015 BMW i3 REX
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2009, 02:18 PM   #4
juhap
Lieutenant
juhap's Avatar
Finland
14
Rep
530
Posts

Drives: sDrive35i
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Finland

iTrader: (0)

Yet another review where the writer thinks the Porsche handling is so good that the car lacks character or is down right dull to drive.

Kudos for Porsche for making such great driver's cars, but "involvement through mild fear" sounds better to me.
Appreciate 0
      11-17-2009, 03:53 PM   #5
Vintage
Colonel
Vintage's Avatar
United_States
378
Rep
2,588
Posts

Drives: BMW G80 (MT), 718 Spyder
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austin, Texas

iTrader: (0)

good article on two great roadsters
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2009, 09:01 AM   #6
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
60
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

Some have said the Z4 M was a rush to drive at the very edge, and maybe the 35i has a acquired a taste of that heritage?
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2009, 09:19 AM   #7
Memphis1
Lieutenant Colonel
Memphis1's Avatar
United_States
89
Rep
1,838
Posts

Drives: Z4 SDrive 35i
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CT

iTrader: (0)

re: the z4M

hammond said it best, "you can't drive it like a precision tool, you have to grab it by the scruff of the neck and treat like the beast it is!"
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-18-2009, 10:24 AM   #8
flpnout
Major
flpnout's Avatar
United_States
81
Rep
1,264
Posts

Drives: 2010 Dinan S3 Z4-35i
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA

iTrader: (8)

Garage List
2010 E89 Z4  [7.83]
My previous BMW was an 2008 m roadster and it was a blast to push to the limits! I wish this new Z4 had the same steering response like the M roadster. Sometimes when I slide around the corner on the new one I hardly notice that I had slid. Other thAn that, I really don't miss the harsh ride on long trips on the M and noisy cabin. they are both great cars just more enthusiast would prefer M. Glad I got a 6 speed manual as I notice a big difference from DCT. after coming from M roadster, I think most would prefer manual as it is more envolving/engaging.
__________________
2015 BMW i3 REX
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 10:46 AM   #9
Lewis@MWDesign
Banned
Canada
261
Rep
1,499
Posts

Drives: 2010 BMW Z4 3.5i 6spd
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hong Kong | Vancouver, BC Canada

iTrader: (28)

Quote:
Originally Posted by flpnout View Post
My previous BMW was an 2008 m roadster and it was a blast to push to the limits! I wish this new Z4 had the same steering response like the M roadster. Sometimes when I slide around the corner on the new one I hardly notice that I had slid. Other thAn that, I really don't miss the harsh ride on long trips on the M and noisy cabin. they are both great cars just more enthusiast would prefer M. Glad I got a 6 speed manual as I notice a big difference from DCT. after coming from M roadster, I think most would prefer manual as it is more envolving/engaging.
The Z4M was definitely a blast to drive but I totally agree with you, it was a bit harsh for a daily driver or long rides unless the entire route consists of canyon type roads.

The new e89 has a few compromises in terms of the sportiness the previous gen M brought but it also brought a new level of comfort and luxury which I don't mind at all. Its pretty easy to get the car back to a sporty level that rivals the old M (suspension and ECU tuning).

DCT was smooth but it doesn't act as quick on spirited drives as a manual gearbox. Glad I stuck with the 6 speed. All it needs is a Short Shifter now...
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 12:13 PM   #10
gt205v6
New Member
5
Rep
28
Posts

Drives: Accord Coupe V6
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewis@MWDesign View Post
The Z4M was definitely a blast to drive but I totally agree with you, it was a bit harsh for a daily driver or long rides unless the entire route consists of canyon type roads.

The new e89 has a few compromises in terms of the sportiness the previous gen M brought but it also brought a new level of comfort and luxury which I don't mind at all. Its pretty easy to get the car back to a sporty level that rivals the old M (suspension and ECU tuning).

DCT was smooth but it doesn't act as quick on spirited drives as a manual gearbox. Glad I stuck with the 6 speed. All it needs is a Short Shifter now...

I think this is a great way of explaining how one should decide in between the new Z4 3.5 or the old Z4 M. Although, I would still go for the Z4 M if I were to buy one tomorrow I'd say (will hopefully happen soon though). I think M engineering is very unique and the elements they put in the car for an M is worth the "stiff" drive.
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 12:31 PM   #11
Lewis@MWDesign
Banned
Canada
261
Rep
1,499
Posts

Drives: 2010 BMW Z4 3.5i 6spd
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hong Kong | Vancouver, BC Canada

iTrader: (28)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gt205v6 View Post
I think this is a great way of explaining how one should decide in between the new Z4 3.5 or the old Z4 M. Although, I would still go for the Z4 M if I were to buy one tomorrow I'd say (will hopefully happen soon though). I think M engineering is very unique and the elements they put in the car for an M is worth the "stiff" drive.
The only difference in terms of handling between the two so far is the fact the new e89 is missing the LSD which is pretty crucial if you are looking to rip the car around nice bends from time to time. Of course with the LSD the car will have a tendency to have less understeer as well...

Having driven both generation of the top Z4s, our objective for our current e89 build is to create a car that has the comforts the current gen possesses but still have the capabilities to be a beast on the track and on canyon runs. We want to create what we think an e89 Z4M would be
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 12:51 PM   #12
jragan
Imola Lover
jragan's Avatar
United_States
26
Rep
749
Posts

Drives: 2007 Imola Red M Coupe
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewis@MWDesign View Post
The only difference in terms of handling between the two so far is the fact the new e89 is missing the LSD which is pretty crucial if you are looking to rip the car around nice bends from time to time. Of course with the LSD the car will have a tendency to have less understeer as well...

Having driven both generation of the top Z4s, our objective for our current e89 build is to create a car that has the comforts the current gen possesses but still have the capabilities to be a beast on the track and on canyon runs. We want to create what we think an e89 Z4M would be
Really?

I'm even amazed, number 1, that anyone would compare this car to a Boxster (much less an S). The E89 is a much better comparison for a Lexus SC430 or Mercedes SLK.

Number 2, there are way more differences than just the LSD. The E86 ///M is a track car, so it also happens to do canyon carving well. But put the E89 on a highly technical road course and then try to compare it (fully modded) to an E86 ///M and you'll see that there really is zero comparison between the two in terms of actual performance.
__________________
His: RIP-"Ruby" E86 ///M Coupe: Pics Track Pics Short Vids Long Vids
Hers: 997-1 C4S: Pics
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 02:26 PM   #13
RemovedUser
Guest
0
Rep
n/a
Posts

Drives:


Id put a LSD into a Z4 before I by a boxster, if Im going P Car im going 996 Turbo.
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 04:04 PM   #14
BlueZ4AZ
Go SU
BlueZ4AZ's Avatar
United_States
33
Rep
902
Posts

Drives: 2009 Z4 sDrive35i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jragan View Post
Really?

I'm even amazed, number 1, that anyone would compare this car to a Boxster (much less an S). The E89 is a much better comparison for a Lexus SC430 or Mercedes SLK.

Number 2, there are way more differences than just the LSD. The E86 ///M is a track car, so it also happens to do canyon carving well. But put the E89 on a highly technical road course and then try to compare it (fully modded) to an E86 ///M and you'll see that there really is zero comparison between the two in terms of actual performance.
Thanks, I needed a good chuckle today. ....Lexus SC430 comparable to the new Z4? Reeeeally? LOL The SC430?? - The 10 year old, ancient technology, stodgy, truck like transmission, bloated excuse for a sports car, designed for blue hairs bath tub that my grandmother would look good in, car???? That SC430??? Surely, you jest.

Everone seems to be comparing the new Z4 with the Boxster S, so this should really come as no surprise or amazement to anyone at this point. As for the Boxster (non S) there is always the Miata to compare IT to.
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 04:26 PM   #15
Roadstergal
First Lieutenant
Roadstergal's Avatar
United_States
26
Rep
360
Posts

Drives: 2010 Z4 35i
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA - East Coast

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueZ4AZ View Post
Thanks, I needed a good chuckle today. ....Lexus SC430 comparable to the new Z4? Reeeeally? LOL The SC430?? - The 10 year old, ancient technology, stodgy, truck like transmission, bloated excuse for a sports car, designed for blue hairs bath tub that my grandmother would look good in, car???? That SC430??? Surely, you jest.

Everone seems to be comparing the new Z4 with the Boxster S, so this should really come as no surprise or amazement to anyone at this point. As for the Boxster (non S) there is always the Miata to compare IT to.
I couldn't have said it better!
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 04:33 PM   #16
lopealle
Resident Black Guy
lopealle's Avatar
Zimbabwe
251
Rep
2,302
Posts

Drives: Lion
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Federal Way, WA

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2006 M5  [10.00]
man those are some beatuful cars
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 05:18 PM   #17
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
60
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jragan View Post
Really?

I'm even amazed, number 1, that anyone would compare this car to a Boxster (much less an S). The E89 is a much better comparison for a Lexus SC430 or Mercedes SLK.

Number 2, there are way more differences than just the LSD. The E86 ///M is a track car, so it also happens to do canyon carving well. But put the E89 on a highly technical road course and then try to compare it (fully modded) to an E86 ///M and you'll see that there really is zero comparison between the two in terms of actual performance.
If you look closely, you’d see that apart from the Z4 M steering rack, the e85 and e89 suspension systems are very similar. The e89 35i is heaver than the M due to the convertible hardtop and the N54 TT engine, but apart from that it’s all a matter of choices BMW made based on their market assessment. It’s pretty clear what the public wanted.

If a person wants a harder track-like ride and handling characteristics, suspension mods are easy. Getting more horses from the n54 is easier than the s54. IMHO, all of this boils down to more possibilities from the e89.

Sure, it’d be great to see BMW slap a S65 M3 v8, an M certified DCT, stiffer stabilizers and dampers in the e89. Z4 M fan disappointment that an M version is not immediately forthcoming is understandable. On the other hand, the e89 Z4 is not like driving a Barcalounger, either, as some would suggest. I think you’re being a little unfair by comparing it to a Lexus toupee flipper designed for the slow mo geriatric set.
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 09:18 PM   #18
willysp
Private
2
Rep
85
Posts

Drives: Z4 '09 35i DCT
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana, US

iTrader: (0)

When I bought my Z3 in 2001, I looked at Boxsters, thought the Boxster was maybe a better car but not worth the $ difference. And I liked the Z3 retro styling better anyway. (And I bought the Z3 that year because I couldn't stand the Bangled Z4 pics I was starting to see)

When I bought my new Z4 a couple of months ago, I thought (1) the Z4 was clearly a better car, (2) the Boxster really hadn't changed much, (3) the higher Boxster price made no sense.
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 09:46 PM   #19
Memphis1
Lieutenant Colonel
Memphis1's Avatar
United_States
89
Rep
1,838
Posts

Drives: Z4 SDrive 35i
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CT

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by willysp View Post
When I bought my new Z4 a couple of months ago, I thought (1) the Z4 was clearly a better car, (2) the Boxster really hadn't changed much, (3) the higher Boxster price made no sense.
+1
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-19-2009, 10:39 PM   #20
Robert
Major General
414
Rep
6,968
Posts

Drives: 135i -> is350 -> Tesla M3 perf
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Socal

iTrader: (1)

A mid-engine p-car vs. a front engine bmw? Sorry pcar all the way. If one fancies a beast then why not more of it? Step into a AMG, vette or camaro? I prefer surgical control through sophistication.
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2009, 12:03 AM   #21
willysp
Private
2
Rep
85
Posts

Drives: Z4 '09 35i DCT
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana, US

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lewis@MWDesign View Post
.............DCT was smooth but it doesn't act as quick on spirited drives as a manual gearbox. Glad I stuck with the 6 speed. All it needs is a Short Shifter now...
You're joking, right?!

Don't think I've seen any credible post yet that says manual is faster than DCT ..... MotorTrend and Car&Track both think the DCT is faster.
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2009, 12:12 AM   #22
willysp
Private
2
Rep
85
Posts

Drives: Z4 '09 35i DCT
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana, US

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by memphis2012 View Post
+1
"it doesn't feel like a pair of turbos, it feels like a pair of testis!!! big meaty ones!!!"
Love your sig!

When I bought my Z3 my brother, who rides a Harley, liked it but wasn't impressed.

When I took him for a ride in the new Z4, he said "I'll just ride, not ready to drive it" .... intimidated, I think.,
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.




zpost
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST