|
|
06-23-2016, 12:05 PM | #1 |
Captain
90
Rep 745
Posts |
Why do E89s wear out rear tires faster than fronts?
Anyone have a theory for this phenom? I put on a set of Bridgestone Potenza S04 Pole Positions about 9k miles ago and checked the tread depth yesterday. 4/32" on the rear and 6/32" for the front. Wear pattern is excellent. I was hoping they would wear better than this and my wife just retired from a job wherein she commuted over a twisty mountain road every day, so this might with have something to do with it. But I'm still left wondering why a none-heavy car like the Z4 (that in this case is not driven all that hard) consistently wears out rears faster than fronts?
Edit: Just looked up the weight distribution and it turns out it close to 50:50; in fact slightly biased towards the rear! Last edited by paris1; 06-23-2016 at 12:35 PM.. |
06-23-2016, 01:46 PM | #2 |
Private First Class
37
Rep 193
Posts |
Its rear wheel drive - all BMW's go through two rears for a set of fronts - Well mine do anyway
__________________
E89 28i (14)
e92 335i (sold) e46 330D (Sold) e46 220D (Sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 03:50 PM | #3 |
Captain
90
Rep 745
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 04:29 PM | #4 |
Captain
75
Rep 679
Posts |
The wider rear tires (geometry), as well as the BMW "lean" (more geometry), and the fact they are the drive axle (your foot) all contribute to this.
Pretty typical for BMWs across the product line. 2x rears to each set of fronts. |
Appreciate
1
|
06-23-2016, 05:01 PM | #5 |
Captain
90
Rep 745
Posts |
I've read this enough to know that it's normal (for a BMW). Just wondering why (for example) my three previous 2WD pickups never did this. Nor did my 390 CID Ford Galaxie w/4 spd and posi (obviously from a previous life!) or two previous Miatas do it.
Last edited by paris1; 06-23-2016 at 05:31 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 11:11 PM | #6 |
Private
12
Rep 55
Posts |
All sports/sporty cars that I've owned wore out quicker on the drive wheels than non-drive wheels. Trucks are lighter in the back unless you always have it loaded. Not sure about Miata.
My wife's 535i has xDrive, but still wears more on the rear than the front, just not as huge of a difference compared to the 2WD cars.
__________________
2019 X3 M40
2014 MINI Cooper S Hardtop 2010 535i xDrive 2005 Yamaha R6 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2016, 07:34 AM | #7 |
Captain
75
Rep 679
Posts |
[QUOTE=paris1;20152069]I've read this enough to know that it's normal (for a BMW). Just wondering why (for example) my three previous 2WD pickups never did this. Nor did my 390 CID Ford Galaxie w/4 spd and posi (obviously from a previous life!) or two previous Miatas do it.[/QU
Mostly due to the wider rears. The geometry places more cornering load on the rear tires. The rear are wider not only for traction, but to prevent oversteer. And just because you don't feel it, don't assume the tires are not spinning a little bit when you get on it, it's just so minimal - but it still takes it's toll. Talk to guys on other BMWs who have went to a square setup (same size tires all 4 corners) and this issue (mostly) goes away. Another benefit is they can rotate tires. Some of the guys tracking their cars go to a square setup to actually build in the oversteer. I used to drive a dodge colt (front wheel drive) in high school in the 80's that was the opposite - 2 sets fronts to a set of rears - and I know that was my right foot doing it... |
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2016, 09:33 AM | #8 |
Private First Class
55
Rep 96
Posts |
I realize you mentioned you have owned other RWD cars that did not do this before, but honestly all RWD sports cars are going to wear out the rears first...
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2016, 10:53 AM | #9 |
Captain
90
Rep 745
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2016, 07:26 PM | #10 |
Colonel
243
Rep 2,387
Posts |
You're putting 300HP down on the rear tires. That's why.
__________________
2016 340i XDrive, EBII/black, 6 MT, M Sport, Track Handling, Cold Weather, Tech, Lighting, Driver Assistance Plus.
2012 Z4 35i, ED 2/24/2012, Melbourne Red Metallic, Black Leather, Carbon Trim, 6MT, M Sport, CW, PP, PS, NAV, CA. |
Appreciate
1
skierman64124.50 |
06-24-2016, 08:36 PM | #11 |
Captain
90
Rep 745
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2016, 01:00 PM | #12 |
Captain
213
Rep 887
Posts |
The rear tires will have a bit more slip, even at stock n54 levels. You may not notice but if you exit a corner with a bit of throttle the rear will slide just a bit. Also hard acceleration will give you the slightest slip.
__________________
GC LITES / BQ TUNE / MHD / FUEL IT BT ECA / WALBRO 525 LPFP / KW V3 / E9X M3 CONTROL ARMS / TURNER REAR CAMBER ARMS / RE BUSHINGS / H&R SWAYS / LUXON STRUTBAR / VRSF 7.5" FMIC / ER CP / TIAL BOV / VTT IN/OUTLETS / AFE PRO5R INTAKE / AR C.L. DP / BMS OCC / RB PVC / CF LIP + SIDE + SPOILER + DIFFUSER / IND REFLECTORS / BLK GRILLS / STUBBY / PB BBK / Forgestar F14 F: 19x9 et35 R: 19x10 et38/ Michelin PSS F: 245/35/19 R: 275/30/19
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2016, 03:08 PM | #13 |
Captain
90
Rep 745
Posts |
All that and there's no doubt more camber change at the rear plus the fact that you can't rotate to even the wear. Those are all good reasons for the rears to wear out first. Never thought I'd miss those 5k tire rotations. Oh well!
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|