New 2009 2010 BMW Z4 - ZPOST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   New 2009 2010 BMW Z4 - ZPOST > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General BMW News and Cars Discussion

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-06-2014, 02:31 PM   #23
BMW269
Brigadier General
No_Country
431
Rep
3,888
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Germany

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by persian54 View Post
I never understood the appeal of a soft top… my 986 was a soft top and it was loud as hell in there. I've been in E85 Z4s and same thing

both my E89 Z4s, E93 335, E93 M3, and SL550, being hardtops… are perfect. It's a coupe when you want it and can easily be turned into a convertible.

Soft top verts can't be coupes.. one main reason I dislike the new M6 vert. I considered one when the concepts were showing hardtops….
BMW had built a hard-top 6 Series F1X, but still decided to go with soft-top, don't know the reasons for it. Hard-top convertibles are better than soft-top, no doubt, but they are not true coupés.

Quote:
Originally Posted by morfinx View Post
Oh dear god please keep the hardtop! Soft tops are ugly
It will surely be hard-top, current Z4 is the best selling one (have to verify). However we don't know if the new Z4 will get an all new hard-top, the same one, as like E93 and F32.

The thing is quite a number do not want any hard-top Z4, but a real Z4 coupé, that is lighter, something like a Z4 M Coupé that could rival the Mercedes AMG-GT.
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 02:40 PM   #24
DR Z4
Private First Class
Canada
8
Rep
135
Posts

Drives: 2008 M Roadster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jparnes1 View Post
Yeah and people got tired of water dripping into the passenger compartment
---> hardtop.
This is not a problem that I can ever recall being reported on the e85 forums. I know that I have owned 2 e85s, and have never had such problems. In fact, I have never had that problem on any soft top I've owned. There are actually more seams on a hard top than a soft top, hence more places for leaks.

Water certainly isn't permeating through the canvas. I firmly believe the folding hardtop is the answer to a question no one asked; unless that question is: how can I reduce by 70% the already meagre storage capacity of my roadster, and increase curb weight?
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 03:27 PM   #25
a.wang
Private First Class
a.wang's Avatar
United_States
12
Rep
111
Posts

Drives: 2011 Jerez E90
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: North Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2011 BMW M3  [0.00]
The most ridiculous thing I can think of:

BMW and Toyota joint make a V6 turbo engine for this Z, not inline, paving the way towards BMW making a comeback in Formula 1... one can dream.
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 03:43 PM   #26
yousefnjr
salty cowboys fan
yousefnjr's Avatar
6112
Rep
3,389
Posts

Drives: ‘06 Z4MR, ‘20 X7, ‘22 M4x
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy_hf View Post
The E89 did a good job getting SLK drivers to the BMW side.
LOL

Until folding hard tops are light and don't take up a ton of space, soft > hard ... No sex jokes
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 04:11 PM   #27
ORIGIN M.
Banned
3160
Rep
9,134
Posts

Drives: ///M
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Hemisphere

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dackelone
It has occurred to me that this concept looks a lot like the Zagato coupes I saw at the BMW Museum this past February... look at the way the hood extens downward into the headlight area. Together with the added body curves... it makes for a very sexy package.



We Visit the Special BMW Concept Cars Display at BMW Museum
http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?p=15532077



Attachment 1072131

Attachment 1072132
Very interesting.

You are right, very close indeed.
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 04:32 PM   #28
Vector Pilot
Lieutenant
Vector Pilot's Avatar
United_States
35
Rep
501
Posts

Drives: 2014 Z4 28i
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicago Metro

iTrader: (0)

Regarding the new Z4-Z5-OR Z7 or whatever they want to call it. Priority one should be, make the new version, less nose heavy by revising the proportions by making it wider and perhaps shorter. Think Boxster. Personally I would welcome BMW offering a high performance hybrid. BTW: I'm on my second E89 and have no problems or issues with the retractable hardtop.
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 04:52 PM   #29
Tommy_hf
First Lieutenant
Netherlands
70
Rep
327
Posts

Drives: F36 CQ M, Z4 E85 3.0iS MSL SC
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands

iTrader: (0)

If they ditch the folding hardtop with a lot of the extra weight being all the way to the rear bumper (hinges, mechanism) and losing the weight in the boot, they can improve the weight distribution. There's more to it than just the 50:50 weight distribution, it's also about where the weight is located relative to the cars gyro point. All that weight (190 kgs in basic trim) reduces performance which can't be all compensated by torque and horses. Handling, weight transfers, braking, tyres, they all suffers from weight. That's why Porsche still makes the sharper handling tool and BMW seems to be the cruiser.
Think about it, Boxster, MR2, Miata (up until the new version MX5, choose the softtop option), Lotus, and alike, they are fun and good handling cars as they haven't gained fat. :-)
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 05:42 PM   #30
hwelvaar
Major
Belgium
112
Rep
1,140
Posts

Drives: BMW M135i MT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

A 6 cylinder turbo ? Hmm, where have we seen that before ?
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 07:30 PM   #31
nicknaz
Lieutenant General
nicknaz's Avatar
3183
Rep
10,509
Posts

Drives: C6Z
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NorCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy_hf View Post
All that weight (190 kgs in basic trim) reduces performance which can't be all compensated by torque and horses. Handling, weight transfers, braking, tyres, they all suffers from weight. That's why Porsche still makes the sharper handling tool and BMW seems to be the cruiser.
Think about it, Boxster, MR2, Miata (up until the new version MX5, choose the softtop option), Lotus, and alike, they are fun and good handling cars as they haven't gained fat. :-)
I dunno, N54 + DCT is a great power train, especially the mod friendliness.. the z4m was very nice for its time but it is outgunned these days.

For a daily driver, the hardtop is perfect (and I live in San Diego and absolutely max out top down driving) and no complaints about the handling

For the track.... E89 is a fail (overheat) without aftermarket help, and I hope BMW corrects with the next gen
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 08:00 PM   #32
ORIGIN M.
Banned
3160
Rep
9,134
Posts

Drives: ///M
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Hemisphere

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hwelvaar
A 6 cylinder turbo ? Hmm, where have we seen that before ?
Dude this is front page news !
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 08:54 PM   #33
imserious
Major
412
Rep
1,049
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 M3 MR
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Orange County, CA

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by red-sauerkraut
The Z4 will be replaced with the Z5, and the venture with Toyota will be the new Z7! The Z7 will be a hybrid with the new S55 M3/4 motor.

No wonder we are all confused.

There will be a Z1, and some point a 2 series derived Z3 and so on.

Don't forget the Z2GCM-Sport. It will also have an i6 turbo.
Appreciate 0
      08-06-2014, 10:30 PM   #34
Kiwi
Captain
New Zealand
145
Rep
917
Posts

Drives: 2015 BMW M Sports Convertible
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Auckland New Zealand

iTrader: (0)

As long as the Z4 is a soft top and not the crazy folding hard top. This is the main reason I didn't upgrade my 2009 Z4 to new Z4
__________________
2015 220i M Sport convertible.
2016 225xe M Sport.
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2014, 02:59 AM   #35
theART
Private First Class
6
Rep
110
Posts

Drives: Varies with season.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC

iTrader: (1)

I'll take next Z4 with I6 Turbo, NON convertible, 6 speed manual and AWD

Fingers crossed it will look better then next gen Audi TTRS

Appreciate 0
      08-07-2014, 03:25 AM   #36
BMW269
Brigadier General
No_Country
431
Rep
3,888
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Germany

iTrader: (0)

For me the question is whether this new (Toyota/)BMW Z4 will be an AMG GT rival?

Will the Z4 be mid-front engine (as the coming new MX-5)? Will the Z4 have transaxle transmission (as the Corvette C7)? Will BMW build a Z4 M Coupé with S55 engine? Will the S55 engine have dry-sump?

If not BMW would be very "astonishingly stupid".

Last edited by BMW269; 08-07-2014 at 03:52 AM..
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2014, 06:09 AM   #37
vladberca
Major General
vladberca's Avatar
Romania
763
Rep
5,560
Posts

Drives: '18 octavia 2.0 tdi dsg
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Craiova

iTrader: (0)

When we'll see the concept car at an Auto Show?
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2014, 10:56 AM   #38
Manbnda
Second Lieutenant
59
Rep
258
Posts

Drives: F30 AW
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MX

iTrader: (0)

I don't understand what Toyota brings to the party in the development of the Z4 specifically. I would somehow understand if it was the 3 series.
Z4 is a sexy car and Toyota is the nemesis of all things sexy.

A new RWD Z4 coupé would be my cup of tea. An expensive looking M235i sized BMW car.

Last edited by Manbnda; 08-07-2014 at 11:05 AM..
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2014, 11:20 AM   #39
Eddien123
Colonel
United_States
1849
Rep
2,553
Posts

Drives: F30 335 6MT
Join Date: May 2013
Location: New Jersey

iTrader: (0)

BM needs to ditch that headlight touching the grille thing. They're forcing every car to do it and it looks so funky
Appreciate 0
      08-07-2014, 11:36 AM   #40
Asbjorn
Captain
Asbjorn's Avatar
China
89
Rep
833
Posts

Drives: Z4 N54 DCT (VTT GC lites)
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: European in China

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy_hf View Post
If they ditch the folding hardtop with a lot of the extra weight being all the way to the rear bumper (hinges, mechanism) and losing the weight in the boot, they can improve the weight distribution. There's more to it than just the 50:50 weight distribution, it's also about where the weight is located relative to the cars gyro point. All that weight (190 kgs in basic trim) reduces performance which can't be all compensated by torque and horses. Handling, weight transfers, braking, tyres, they all suffers from weight. That's why Porsche still makes the sharper handling tool and BMW seems to be the cruiser.
Think about it, Boxster, MR2, Miata (up until the new version MX5, choose the softtop option), Lotus, and alike, they are fun and good handling cars as they haven't gained fat. :-)
The E89 *could be* more fun and better handling than the boxter/MR2/Miata for three main reasons that people tend to forget:

1) It is more comfortable (especially if you replace the oem tires with non-RFTs). Outside the track and while traveling less than 160km/h this is what defines fun and good handling to me. The vast majority of the time I feel happier when I am not uncomfortable (yes, I am looking at you, M sports suspension).
2) It is easier to get sideways (because the (easily tuned) N54 offers more torque from low rpm)
3) It is more fun while you are sideways (because you sit closer to the rear wheels and feel the slide much more directly/violently - like sitting in the back of a bus in a turn, as opposed to sitting in the middle)

Is it a sharper handling tool? No. But you can get a 1 series M coupe for less if that is what you really want. Even an imaginary lighter soft-top Z4 can't compete with that. But then you can also wave goodbye to cruising in comfort...

And why would you want a convertible roadster which isn't comfortable enough for cruising anyway? That being said, I am surprised someone has yet to modify a E89 by removing the roof and hydraulic systems completely.

BTW the Z4 doesn't actually offer 50:50 weight distribution... in fact, is probably the most rear-heavy small BMW that you can buy today. I believe the 28i is 47-53% for instance.

Last edited by Asbjorn; 08-08-2014 at 05:50 AM..
Appreciate 0
      08-08-2014, 02:56 AM   #41
zpost11
Registered
0
Rep
4
Posts

Drives: Z4
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: usa

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asbjorn View Post
The E89 is more fun and better handling than the boxter/MR2/Miata for three main reasons that people tend to forget:

1) It is more comfortable (especially if you replace the oem tires with non-RFTs). Outside the track and while traveling less than 160km/h this is what defines fun and good handling to me. The vast majority of the time I feel happier when I am not uncomfortable (yes, I am looking at you, M sports suspension).
2) It is easier to get sideways (because the (easily tuned) N54 offers more torque from low rpm)
3) It is more fun while you are sideways (because you sit closer to the rear wheels and feel the slide much more directly/violently - like sitting in the back of a bus in a turn, as opposed to sitting in the middle)

Is it a sharper handling tool? No. But you can get a 1 series M coupe for less if that is what you really want. Even an imaginary lighter soft-top Z4 can't compete with that. But then you can also wave goodbye to cruising in comfort...

And why would you want a convertible roadster which isn't comfortable enough for cruising anyway? That being said, I am surprised someone has yet to modify a E89 by removing the roof and hydraulic systems completely.

BTW the Z4 doesn't actually offer 50:50 weight distribution... in fact, is probably the most rear-heavy small BMW that you can buy today. I believe the 28i is 47-53% for instance.


I can understand why you have to defend your choice of purchase (E89) but the statements above are laughable and I don't mean any disrespect.

First of all I own a fully loaded 2007 Z4. Drive the E89 extensively and also driven the 2013-2014 981 (current generation) Boxster many times and in different places.

I can tell you without any doubt that the current generation Boxster is in a whole different league than E89 Z4, SLK, MR2, Miata, etc.... There is simply no comparison between the current generation Boxster and the rest. The current generation Boxster is not simply gorgeous inside & out, its chassis and suspension setup is superior to the Z4 in every way from its stellar 10/10 handling, to its adaptive suspension precision, and its daily comfort as a driver. It surpasses the Z4 in every aspect mentioned above. On top, its a mid engine with excellent balance and weighs some 500 lbs LESS than the Z4. Therefore, your statement that the E89 is more fun and handles better than the Boxster is laughable, mind you this is not an opinion, this is fact. The current Z4 is beautiful in looks, but dynamics and drive it suffers from hardtop, 300-500 lbs extra weight compared to E85 and is really a nice cruiser with a sporting veneer to it. It is a hairdressers car.

2. Second statement you mentioned its easier to get "sideways", don't know what exactly you point to there but rent the Boxster for a week and than come back with this statement, I think not.

BMW Z4 simply does not have the harmonious equilibrium of the Boxster in comfort and sport modes. It might try to come close but not very close at all. And that's why you pay 10-12k more for a similarly optioned Z4/Boxster.

The only person who might agree with you, probably a single professional female or a mommy who simply just likes the look of the Z4 and that's it.

Listen, I am not biased toward BMW nor Porsche, but if you know what your talking about and if you drive both cars for some time, there is really no comparison accept for one, they are both German.
Appreciate 0
      08-08-2014, 04:00 AM   #42
Asbjorn
Captain
Asbjorn's Avatar
China
89
Rep
833
Posts

Drives: Z4 N54 DCT (VTT GC lites)
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: European in China

iTrader: (0)

My point was that the Z4 is more comfortable, easier to drift, and more fun while doing it. That is what I call fun, and I am well aware that most "enthusiasts" may think something else is more fun. It surely doesn't out-handle a Boxter in the traditional sense (ie slalom speeds etc).

Quote:
Originally Posted by zpost11 View Post
[...] its daily comfort as a driver. It surpasses the Z4 in every aspect mentioned above.
So you are saying that a Boxter is more comfortable to drive than a Z4? Maybe you drove an E89 with 19" wheels, runflats and lowered adaptive M suspension? I am on non-sport standard suspension, 18" and non-runflats... hope this explains.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zpost11 View Post
On top, its a mid engine with excellent balance and weighs some 500 lbs LESS than the Z4.
And this is another reason why the Z4 is easier to drift. The Boxter has wider and much better tires (265 vs 255), less weight (almost 500lbs) and much less torque (especially at low rpm), meaning that it is more difficult to get into a drift. It simply wants to grip instead of power-sliding. And please remember: More grip = less fun!

Quote:
Originally Posted by zpost11 View Post
Therefore, your statement that the E89 is more fun and handles better than the Boxster is laughable, mind you this is not an opinion, this is fact.
Well, please understand that not everyone thinks more grip and a harder suspension is more fun. I of course agree it doesn't handle better in terms of cornering speeds etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zpost11 View Post
2. Second statement you mentioned its easier to get "sideways", don't know what exactly you point to there but rent the Boxster for a week and than come back with this statement, I think not.
You simply can't get the same intense feeling when going sideways in a mid-engined car. The seating position is different. This is a trade-off between being able to feel what the front-end is doing vs the rear-end. In the Z4 you sit as far back as you can, and in that lies a hidden gem. But most Z4 owners will never know, because they don't turn DSC=off. In fact it scares most people the first time the rear end slides in sport+, because it is felt so violently in a roadster like the E89.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zpost11 View Post
BMW Z4 simply does not have the harmonious equilibrium of the Boxster in comfort and sport modes. It might try to come close but not very close at all. And that's why you pay 10-12k more for a similarly optioned Z4/Boxster.
I don't think a Z4 is in anyway trying to come close to a Boxter. This, in the same way BMW is not trying to be Porsche.

Last edited by Asbjorn; 08-08-2014 at 04:07 AM..
Appreciate 0
      08-08-2014, 08:22 AM   #43
BMW269
Brigadier General
No_Country
431
Rep
3,888
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Germany

iTrader: (0)

^ Toyota GT86 is fun.
Appreciate 0
      08-08-2014, 08:36 AM   #44
613Bimmer
Lieutenant
613Bimmer's Avatar
Canada
106
Rep
410
Posts

Drives: One car with good steering ;)
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levi View Post
^ Toyota GT86 is fun.
Lol

Just hope the new Z4 isn't AWD and a V6. That is all.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.




zpost
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST