New 2009 2010 BMW Z4 - ZPOST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   New 2009 2010 BMW Z4 - ZPOST > BMW Z4 Forum (E89) > 2009-Current Z4 Forum (E89) General Discussion

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-26-2010, 05:39 AM   #1
Ermis
Enlisted Member
Ermis's Avatar
Greece
10
Rep
34
Posts

Drives: Z4
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Athens

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
18inch or 19inch in sdrive23?

Got my new Z4 sdrive 23i and i would like to replace the stock 17 inch wheels with 18inch or 19 inch. I am just wondering if 19 inch wheels will affect in a bad way the performance of the car.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2010, 07:55 AM   #2
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
62
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

Some may say that 19's look better, but depending on your roads, 18's may be a better setup to prevent flats and wheel damage. 18"'s will ride nicer, too.

Last edited by teagueAMX; 04-26-2010 at 08:01 AM..
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2010, 07:58 AM   #3
alan64
Lieutenant
alan64's Avatar
20
Rep
484
Posts

Drives: z4
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by teagueAMX View Post
Some may say that 19"'s look better, but depending on your roads, 18"'s may be a better setup to prevent flats and wheel damage. 18"'s will ride nicer, too.
yes, absolutely.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2010, 09:32 AM   #4
bill123
Private First Class
United Kingdom
6
Rep
131
Posts

Drives: Z4 35iS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: England

iTrader: (0)

I have 326 19" fitted and the ride is better than my e85 with 18" wheels
__________________
35iS, Deep Sea Blue, 19" 326 alloys, etc
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2010, 03:29 PM   #5
cdeslandes
Captain
cdeslandes's Avatar
United_States
27
Rep
676
Posts

Drives: 2010 Z4 s35i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Connecticut

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
As a rule of thumb, bigger wheels will make a car's ride harsher (due to lower profile tires) and will degrade handling (due to higher unsprung weight and higher moment of inertia.)

That's why F1 cars use tiny 13" rims!

If you want larger wheels and compansate for the handling degradation, you'll have to spend more money to get really lightweight rims.
__________________
2010 BMW Z4 s35i
2014 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon
2013 Volvo XC90
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2010, 03:54 PM   #6
Memphis1
Lieutenant Colonel
Memphis1's Avatar
United_States
93
Rep
1,838
Posts

Drives: Z4 SDrive 35i
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CT

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ermis27 View Post
Got my new Z4 sdrive 23i and i would like to replace the stock 17 inch wheels with 18inch or 19 inch. I am just wondering if 19 inch wheels will affect in a bad way the performance of the car.
put it this way... the stock 17" wheels weigh in at 26.5 lbs... if you get, as an example, miro 942s 19" rims, they weigh less at 24 and 25lbs. so you wont' get unsprung weight but just be aware that they will bend easier if you go thru a pothole big enough and your ride will be a bit stiffer, but not in a bad way, since you're not driving an F1 car, i assume greece has speed limits on the streets and highways. having said that, as far as looks they will definitely look worlds better.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2010, 04:49 PM   #7
Z4Andy
Private First Class
United Kingdom
10
Rep
170
Posts

Drives: Z4 Sdrive 35iS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Belfast

iTrader: (0)

Re:

I test drove a car on 17's.

Then I was told the only car available at the time was coming in on 19's. I was getting a really good deal so I went for it and to be honest the car drives great on 19" runflats.

I was concerned at first but the car really drives fine even on our crumbly N.Ireland roads.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2010, 12:01 PM   #8
Ermis
Enlisted Member
Ermis's Avatar
Greece
10
Rep
34
Posts

Drives: Z4
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Athens

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Thank you all, for your opinions
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2010, 01:02 PM   #9
zEdP
Ed
Netherlands
18
Rep
298
Posts

Drives: Z4 sDrive30i
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Netherlands

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdeslandes View Post
As a rule of thumb, bigger wheels will make a car's ride harsher (due to lower profile tires) and will degrade handling (due to higher unsprung weight and higher moment of inertia.)
For 'normal' tires, none RFT’s this is the case. But for RFT's I'm not quite sure. These tires are already very stiff. I assume the difference won’t be that noticeable. And about the weight, I assume that 17" need more steel within the tires than 19" will have. This will be compensated because the 19" rims will be heavier than the 17" ones.

EdP
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2010, 10:58 PM   #10
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
62
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ermis27 View Post
Thank you all, for your opinions
What are your roads like? I've been watching some tube vids and it appears that in various parts of Europe and the Mediterranean the roads are pretty good. In other parts it's been noted the roads are not good. A Greek friend of mine has family in a very rural area. He visited his parents and I had to cal his village to send somebody out to his family's farm so he could come into town and call me. Anyway, he indicates some of their roads are not very good.

If you drive in areas with good roads, then low profile tires won't be much of a problem for you. On the other hand, poor roads can quickly damage low profile tires and wheels. I see it all the time in Southern California, a place that you'd think has pretty good roads. Keep in mind that an average sized pot hole can be equal to or actually deeper than the cross sectional height of the tire. What this translate to in normal use is a low profile tire sidewall can pinch down to within a few millimeters at speed. That force can damage your wheel, resulting in tire decompression.

FWIW
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2010, 03:51 AM   #11
solidgold
Private
10
Rep
82
Posts

Drives: Z4 E89
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Singapore

iTrader: (0)

Any recommendations for those going for 19"?

Option 1 :
225/30/R19 (front) 255/35/R19 (rear)

Option 2 :
235/30/R19 (front) 265/35/R19 (rear)

For option 2, will tyre rub arches when it is too wide at the rear?
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2010, 06:31 AM   #12
Ermis
Enlisted Member
Ermis's Avatar
Greece
10
Rep
34
Posts

Drives: Z4
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Athens

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
I live in Athens.There are not actually good or bad roads. You can drive your car let's say in a 'good' road and suddenly see a large pot hole. My previous car was a Saab 93 Aero with (225/45/17) and i've never had a problem before with damaged wheels.
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2010, 08:59 AM   #13
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
62
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

Normally with a 45 (225/45/17) profile height you wouldn't have trouble unless you hit some really, really bad potholes. However, with 19" low profile tire I think you would see a problem. With a 19" wheel your profile is getting down to 35 in the front and 30 in the rear.

If you roads are not so bad most of the time, I'd suggest that you go no larger than 18". They have a profile height of 40 in the front, which is where your greatest impact occurs and 35 height in the rear.

If they run good and bad about 50-50 you might consider using the 17" wheel. The 17" wheels are 225/45 front and 255/40 rear, which is very close to the profile height of your previous car.

It's really up to you. Smaller wheels don't look as sporty to some people. I like them personally, and they can be less expensive in the long run for you if you have bad roads. Plus they will help cushion the ride when you go over rough pavement.

Last edited by teagueAMX; 04-28-2010 at 09:31 AM..
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2010, 09:28 AM   #14
T89
Lieutenant Colonel
T89's Avatar
Switzerland
41
Rep
1,531
Posts

Drives: Z4 35i & Mini Cooper S
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Geneva & Joburg

iTrader: (0)

Is it possible to run 255/35 19" at the rear?


T
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2010, 09:36 AM   #15
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
62
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

If you don't have staggered wheel widths front/rear - same wheel width front and back. Nowadays they like to have the same tire height front/rear.

The middle number of the tire size (e.g., 225/45/17) is the tire sidewall profile ratio. It is multiplied by the tire width, so if you have wider wheel in back than the front, to keep the overall tire height the same front/rear, they change the profile height for the rear.
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2010, 09:43 AM   #16
T89
Lieutenant Colonel
T89's Avatar
Switzerland
41
Rep
1,531
Posts

Drives: Z4 35i & Mini Cooper S
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Geneva & Joburg

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by teagueAMX View Post
If you don't have staggered wheel widths front/rear - same wheel width front and back. Nowadays they like to have the same tire height front/rear.

The middle number of the tire size (e.g., 225/45/17) is the tire sidewall profile ratio. It is multiplied by the tire width, so if you have wider wheel in back than the front, to keep the overall tire height the same front/rear, they change the profile height for the rear.
I guess it's a no then, since I'm running a staggered set up.

But the e92 m3 runs a staggered set up but still runs 245/35/19 and 265/35/19...?


T
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2010, 07:36 PM   #17
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
62
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by T89 View Post
I guess it's a no then, since I'm running a staggered set up.

But the e92 m3 runs a staggered set up but still runs 245/35/19 and 265/35/19...?


T
Sorry, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you can't run the same profile ratio for different width tires. I'm sure it's done all the time. As mentioned before the profile is a ratio, or multiplier, based on the tire width. This is say that the sidewall height is taller for 265 width tire vs a 245. Given in our discussion the wheel diameter the same, then the overall diameter of the tire increases. Not necessarily a bad thing, but as mentioned the trend today is to use tires with equal height front and back. Some super performance cars today have different diameter wheels to compensate.

Look at the 1st chart below that I screen captured from tirerack.com. This is for staggered wheel/tires that have the same diameter, which is the OEM configuration. The consideration in the days of old when using different height tires is the speedometer needed adjustment. However, I'm sure that today there is a different compensation mechanism (likely software or automatic calibration).

Frankly, it's been a long time since I read all those books on setting up your suspension for optimum performance so I don't recall the impact of having a taller tire in the back except to say it likely would shift your weight distribution and alter braking slightly. Wider tires in the rear of the car does give you a bit more grip back there, but people will tell you that also contributes to additional understeer, which is a condition the Z4 is subject too.

Hope that helps. FWIW

.
Attached Images
  

Last edited by teagueAMX; 04-28-2010 at 07:48 PM..
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2010, 09:50 PM   #18
Memphis1
Lieutenant Colonel
Memphis1's Avatar
United_States
93
Rep
1,838
Posts

Drives: Z4 SDrive 35i
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CT

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by solidgold View Post
Any recommendations for those going for 19"?

Option 1 :
225/30/R19 (front) 255/35/R19 (rear)

Option 2 :
235/30/R19 (front) 265/35/R19 (rear)

For option 2, will tyre rub arches when it is too wide at the rear?
hi solidgold, option 2 is fine, they wont rub, BUT the correct set up is 235/35/19front and 265/30/19rear

Quote:
Originally Posted by ermis27 View Post
I live in Athens.There are not actually good or bad roads. You can drive your car let's say in a 'good' road and suddenly see a large pot hole. My previous car was a Saab 93 Aero with (225/45/17) and i've never had a problem before with damaged wheels.
hi Ermis, 17" will only bend on a huge pothole doing maybe 80mph(i've done it before). 19" wheels will bend pretty easily, (i've done it at like 30mph in NYC, notorious for huge potholes) i would suggest 18" wheels for you; 19" at your own risk

Quote:
Originally Posted by T89 View Post
Is it possible to run 255/35 19" at the rear?
T
Quote:
Originally Posted by T89 View Post
I guess it's a no then, since I'm running a staggered set up.But the e92 m3 runs a staggered set up but still runs 245/35/19 and 265/35/19...?T
hi T89, the M3 has the suspension set up differently than the Z4, that's why OEM it's the same ratio, which clearly gives a diff height front to rear, but the suspension compensates for that. for the Z4 you need to take that into account, so you can run 225/35/19front and 255/30/19rear or even what I suggested to solidgold, 235/35/19front 265/30/19rear

the basic math is 25.4 mm = 1 inch (using the first suggestion):

front
225 is the width in millimeters = 8.86" inches
35 is the percentage of the width = 3.10" inches (from rim to road)
19 = obvious (the wheel size in inches)

rear
255 is the width in millimeters = 10.04" inches
30 is the percentage of the width = 3.01" inches (from rim to road)
__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-28-2010, 10:04 PM   #19
solidgold
Private
10
Rep
82
Posts

Drives: Z4 E89
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Singapore

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
hi solidgold, option 2 is fine, they wont rub, BUT the correct set up is 235/35/19front and 265/30/19rear
Thks alot. My mistakes in the middle number. Should be lower number 30 at the rear and 35 in front to balance.
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2010, 04:25 AM   #20
Ermis
Enlisted Member
Ermis's Avatar
Greece
10
Rep
34
Posts

Drives: Z4
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Athens

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
I will go for 18''. Thanks
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2010, 05:49 AM   #21
T89
Lieutenant Colonel
T89's Avatar
Switzerland
41
Rep
1,531
Posts

Drives: Z4 35i & Mini Cooper S
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Geneva & Joburg

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by teagueAMX View Post
Sorry, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you can't run the same profile ratio for different width tires. I'm sure it's done all the time. As mentioned before the profile is a ratio, or multiplier, based on the tire width. This is say that the sidewall height is taller for 265 width tire vs a 245. Given in our discussion the wheel diameter the same, then the overall diameter of the tire increases. Not necessarily a bad thing, but as mentioned the trend today is to use tires with equal height front and back. Some super performance cars today have different diameter wheels to compensate.

Look at the 1st chart below that I screen captured from tirerack.com. This is for staggered wheel/tires that have the same diameter, which is the OEM configuration. The consideration in the days of old when using different height tires is the speedometer needed adjustment. However, I'm sure that today there is a different compensation mechanism (likely software or automatic calibration).

Frankly, it's been a long time since I read all those books on setting up your suspension for optimum performance so I don't recall the impact of having a taller tire in the back except to say it likely would shift your weight distribution and alter braking slightly. Wider tires in the rear of the car does give you a bit more grip back there, but people will tell you that also contributes to additional understeer, which is a condition the Z4 is subject too.

Hope that helps. FWIW

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by memphis2012 View Post

hi T89, the M3 has the suspension set up differently than the Z4, that's why OEM it's the same ratio, which clearly gives a diff height front to rear, but the suspension compensates for that. for the Z4 you need to take that into account, so you can run 225/35/19front and 255/30/19rear or even what I suggested to solidgold, 235/35/19front 265/30/19rear

the basic math is 25.4 mm = 1 inch (using the first suggestion):

front
225 is the width in millimeters = 8.86" inches
35 is the percentage of the width = 3.10" inches (from rim to road)
19 = obvious (the wheel size in inches)

rear
255 is the width in millimeters = 10.04" inches
30 is the percentage of the width = 3.01" inches (from rim to road)
Thanks for clearing it out guys.

I'm looking to upsize to 235/35/19 and 265/30/19 to accommodate the wider wheels I just got (8.5"/ 9.5"). But due to swiss homologation laws, we need to stick within Bmws OEM specs which are 225/35/19 and 255/30/19.


T
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2010, 07:57 AM   #22
teagueAMX
Colonel
teagueAMX's Avatar
United_States
62
Rep
2,087
Posts

Drives: Some are road worthy
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: So Cal, USA

iTrader: (0)

^"But due to swiss homologation laws. . ."

They really tie your hands.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 AM.




zpost
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST