View Single Post
      01-12-2011, 11:58 AM   #34
pwrdbym
Second Lieutenant
160
Rep
224
Posts

Drives: 06 Z4M Roadster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: OKC, OK

iTrader: (0)

I'm growing tired of the better efficiency claim of turbo engines. Real world numbers are not showing this to be the case. The NA I-6 from BMW gets over 30MPG highway in many models, no worse than Audi's 2.0T. Ford's SHO with V8 power and V6 efficicnecy is getting 16-17mpg in long term tests. All the while the turbo engines are produced at a higher initial cost and a higher replacement costs to the owner. Plus BMW hasn't proved that they can reliably build a turbo yet. I think turbos are being forced into the market with the hybrids and other "green" models. I'm all for more efficient and powerful engines but I'd like the numbers to actually reflect the claims.
__________________
11 BMW E93 M3-- 06 BMW Z4M Roadster
99 BMW M Coupe -- 85 BMW M635CSI
97 M3 Coupe (Track)--95 BMW M3 Coupe
91 BMW 850i 6MT--20 Ram 1500
16 Chevy Tahoe 4WD
Appreciate 0