View Single Post
      05-11-2017, 03:07 PM   #60
RACEM4TE
Banned
374
Rep
243
Posts

Drives: S63 AMG COUPÈ, Mclaren 675LT
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Abu Dhabi

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kashe5_AMG
Quote:
Originally Posted by RACEM4TE View Post
Its crap and will probably break in the the first couple of months and will have 3848283838 Problems and recalls also its no faster than a GT3 RS because the 7:20 time of the RS is just a speculation and the 991.2 GT3 lapped the ring in 7:12, thats just a warning for mercedes that they can and will break the GTRS 7:11 time with either the 991.2 GT3 And the 991.2 GT3 RS and the upcoming GT2 and GT2 RS and how is it faster than the 918 while the 918 lapped the ring in 6:57? If you're talking about the magazines time it's irrelevant. Mercedes is crap and will always be crap with their shit mct transmissions and their heavy ass chassises and crap quality like ffs the C63S amg weighs 1950 while the M4 weighs 1550 kilos. Thats M5 weight in the C63. Shows how crap mercedes is.
ya rayal, madri wsh tgool.......maynoon, 9dj.

mercedes is not crap. yes, the c63s coupe weighs 1857kg, the m4 weighs 1572kg to be exact. the c63s sedan weighs 1749 kg. but youre comparing a 444 hp/406 ft-lb torque 6-cylinder with a 503 hp/516 ft-lb torque 8-cylinder engined car....that extra weight would give you better traction on a car putting out more than 100+ ft-lb more of torque. so the weight point needs to be taken in the overall context of the car. it's not like you're comparing two 6-cylinder cars putting out about the same amount of torque/hp. if you were then you could compare the weight of the two and say mercedes is crap. the mct is not "shit" as you claim. the shifting on it is pretty quick/very little noticeable lag if any at all.

i'd buy the c63s any day over the m4, even for the sole reason that it doesnt sound as richard hammond so elequently put it, "like a fart in bathwater" like the m4's sound these days. sayara 9otha k2anha tt6ag3. exhaust zbala.

if you were comparing the e92/e93 m3's, those things were beauties. but bmw went from making a badass german track & muscle car, to a car that is "more fuel efficient" but sounds like garbage. give me the v8 from the e9x series m3's any day.

3ndi so2al lk, ent mt9w3?
amgs are famous in the GCC Area, while M isn't because all people care about are V8s. At the end of the day im not buying a car with a V8 to show off but rather im a buying a drivers car. Also the F8x platfroms exhaust are not zbaalah but rather better than a Turbo V8. (Subjective opinion) also mercedes has more torque and power than the M4 to cover their heavy ass weight. Power is not everything but rather balance.
Appreciate 0